Why only some former smokers develop lung cancer
Less experienced prostitutes are more likely to have sexually transmitted infections (STIs). A study of more than a thousand female sex workers in Cambodia, reported in the open access journal BMC Infectious Diseases, has shown that girls who were new to the sex industry were twice as likely to have gonorrhoea or chlamydia. Heng Sopheab
Full Post: Inexperienced sex workers most at risk of sexual infections
Canadian researchers are trying to answer why some smokers develop lung cancer while others remain disease free, despite similar lifestyle changes.
Results were presented at the American Association for Cancer Research’s Seventh Annual International Conference on Frontiers in Cancer Prevention Research.
According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, more people die from lung cancer than any other cancer type. In fact, according to 2004 data, more people died from lung cancer than breast, prostate and colon cancers combined.
Smoking is the biggest risk factor for developing lung cancer, even after quitting for long periods of time. “More than 50 percent of newly diagnosed lung cancer patients are former smokers,” said Emily A. Vucic, a graduate student at the British Columbia Cancer Research Centre, Vancouver, B.C. “Understanding why some former smokers develop lung cancer is clearly important to the development of early detection, prevention and treatment strategies.”
The researchers studied how DNA methylation contributes to lung cancer development in former smokers. Methylation is an important event regulating gene expression during normal development. As we age and in cancer, proper patterns of DNA methylation become deregulated throwing off the tight control of gene activity that normally exists.
Using an endoscope, Vucic and colleagues collected bronchial epithelial cells, which are cells that line the lungs, from 16 former smokers. The participants quit smoking more than 10 years ago. Eight participants had surgical removal of non-small cell lung cancer; eight were disease free.
Their results showed differences in methylation levels in lung epithelial cells between former smokers with and without lung cancer.
“Alteration to DNA methylation might potentially explain why some former smokers sustain additional genetic damage resulting in lung cancer,” Vucic said. “As methylation is a reversible DNA modification, this knowledge could prompt the development and application of chemopreventive agents and unique therapeutic strategies that target DNA methylation in these patients.”
Exposure to cigarette smoke is a major culprit in disease development. “In addition to DNA sequence mutations, cigarette smoke also causes widespread errors in DNA marks, such as DNA methylation, used to regulate gene function and genome stability,” Vucic said.
Cigarette smoke exposure has been shown to activate genes that promote cancer and deactivate genes that stop tumor growth, she said. “Studies examining tumors at all levels of DNA disruption will identify events involved in lung cancer development in former smokers.”
The researchers are pursuing additional studies to confirm their initial results, Vucic said.
While examining patterns of DNA modification in lung cancer, a team of international researchers has discovered what they say is a surprising new mechanism. They say that “silencing” of a single gene in lung cancer led to a general impairment in genome-wide changes in cells, contributing to cancer development and progression. In the January 1,
Full Post: In lung cancer, silencing one crucial gene disrupts normal functioning of genome
To decipher how cancer develops, Johns Hopkins Kimmel Cancer Center investigators say researchers must take a closer look at the packaging. Specifically, their findings in the December 2, 2008, issue of PLoS Biology point to the three dimensional chromatin packaging around genes formed by tight, rosette-like loops of Polycomb group proteins (PcG). The chromatin packaging,
Full Post: Chromatin packaging helps decipher how cancer develops
Typically, tobacco companies market harm-reduction cigarettes as being safer than traditional “full-flavored” brands, leading many smokers to conclude that the use of harm-reduction brands lowers their exposure to toxicants. But a UC Riverside study now shows that smoke from these “light” or “low-yield” harm-reduction cigarettes retains toxicity and that this toxicity can affect prenatal development.
Full Post: Light cigarettes may be more toxic than traditional cigarettes
The association between tobacco smoke and cancer deaths - beyond lung cancer deaths - has been strengthened by a recent study from a UC Davis researcher, suggesting that increased tobacco control efforts could save more lives than previously estimated. The epidemiological analysis, published online in BMC Cancer, linked smoking to more than 70 percent of the cancer
Full Post: Study links smoking with most male cancer deaths
If you need another reason to quit smoking, consider that it may diminish your chances of being a parent or grandparent. Scientists at the University of Rochester Medical Center have found that women exposed to second hand smoke, either as adults or children, were significantly more likely to face fertility problems and suffer miscarriages. An
Full Post: Passive smoking raises odds of fertility problems in women